Wednesday, June 20, 2007
Poll Over
Saturday, June 16, 2007
electricity
It sounds tacky, but this book was fun fun and I can honestly describe it as a ROMP. Fleischman's foreward left me dubious--cribbing seven plays into one? Sounds confusing. But he successfully took a mess of typical genres apart and slapped them back together. The cross-play travel reminded me of Jasper Fforde's Thursday Next books, if anyone else has read them.
I think my favorite part was when the actors broke character and/or allowed a layer of their personal reality to influence the scene. The fishbowl scene was hysterical.
This was a short book, so I don't have a lot to say besides I really enjoyed reading it and Fleischman continues to amaze me with his myriad storytelling abilities. So many genres, so many methods.
Monday, May 28, 2007
Photoshopped Children's Book Covers
I like the version of Caps for Sale on page six.
No--The Tiger who Came to Tea is better. (page seven)
Friday, May 18, 2007
Monday, May 07, 2007
This month's book's author
Discussion begins the 15th! Do you have your copy of Stay with Me?
Monday, April 16, 2007
Blown Moon
Ach; disappointment! Was Koponen going for a story or a biographical account of her life? The book straddles an uncomfortable position between "this is what really happened" and fiction, settling for neither, leaving the reader (me, anyways) confused. Pick one or the other, please. Sometimes there was too much exposition, not enough character development. Other times, Koponen describes herself as a child--especially her thinking processes--in an apt, realistic manner.
Either way, clean up the cutesy writing and CUT BACK ON EXCLAMATION POINTS. We also know (how we know, how you repeat it over and over) that you really, really, really, REALLY like Henry. We don't know why (or really care), but we know you do.
It's a screaming "First Novel."
Thursday, March 29, 2007
Gene Yang Interview @ Cybils
Gene: I think of American Born Chinese as fiction with autobiography sprinkled in. Parts of the Jin storyline are lifted directly from my junior high experiences. Much of the dialog of the Timmy character, for instance, came from a group of kids that used to torment me and my Asian-American friends. The three strands started off as ideas for three separate stories. Somewhere along the way, I decided to try to bring them together, almost as an intellectual exercise. They're thematically connected, but I wanted connect them in a more concrete way.
His next book comes out in the spring of next year!
Monday, March 19, 2007
Brotherhood 2.0: March 19th: Urban Exploration
Tobin's on the Brotherhood!
(And he has a scarf on, per usual.)
Food, Glorious Food!
I'm tentatively planning to attend the Institute but am confused about the cost. Is there a separate cost for the Symposium vs. just the Institute? If there is, I can't find it.
FYI, the April book is Blow Out the Moon by Libby Koponen. Reserve your library copy now or buy it in paperback.
More FYI, I'm tweaking the page and will probably upgrade the template later this week. I sorted through the links on the right column and now they ALL work and lead to interesting sites with lots of reading suggestions.
Friday, March 16, 2007
I hate self-referential books
I do, it's true. I almost lost my love for Stephen King's Dark Tower books when he appeared as himself in the last parts of the epic. Last week, I had to put Richard Powers's Galatea 2.2 down (instead of throwing it across the room; it was a library book) after discovering "R.P." was Mr. Powers himself. It's like the author wants to be patted on the head: now aren't YOU clever!
Granted, John Connolly is not David, the revealed author of The Book of Lost Things, but the text screams CLEVER CLEVER!!! at me. Also, DERISIVE! and CHILDISH! (Don't confuse that with childLIKE, a perfectly fine thing to have in a young-person's book.)
Alas, I am left puzzled. I still can't decide if I liked it or not. I didn't hate it, but it didn't ring any bells for me either. Technically, the book is published for adults (it won nominations for being a YA crossover) but it reads more like the sort of story an adult thinks hearkens back to oh-so innocent childhood. The stripped down narrative is merely a collection of snapshots from fractured fairy tales, most with pre-Victorian morbidness added back in--and then some. The portions of darkdark blood and guts did not mesh with the ridiculous bits, like the whole seven dwarfs scenario.
It frustrated me to no end how little the inhabitants of Fairyland/Dreamland/The Afterlife/whatever knew about their country. The first rule of fantasy is there must be rules--some logic, please! But a whole population of individuals who have no local or historical knowledge? Instead of rich characters, they become a whole lotta cutouts, reliant on what little of their personalities Connolly chose to include and what we know about them from general knowledge--Roland, for example. Here's a knight*** who cannot remember the order of kings and queens. And don't get me started on the dumb townspeople.
So David killed Rumpelstiltskin? Anansi? Coyote? Kokopelli? Loki? The Devil? Is all Heaven safe now--or was that Hell? Is the afterlife the stuff books are made of? Where is everyone else who died? Ack!
Why does the woman in the tower want David? Was she calling the whole time? Is she modelled after a fairyland character and I'm totally missing it?
Did anyone else know the answer to the troll's riddle? Hello! Labyrinth!
There's the whole copout with the plane crash, (COME ON--WHAT ARE THE ODDS???) meaning one could legitimately finish the book thinking David was just a nutty, dreamy man with an imagination and troubled childhood. (The plane crash also led me to believe David was in a Donnie Darko situation, dead and just ambling around the empty spaces in his mind--something he asks Roland on page 208.) On a whole, the book was too neat and tidy. David never has to work hard at anything; it all comes to him rather easily. All natural, no real effort or sacrifice. The Woodsman has Great Timing at the end, of course.
Maybe I've read too many fairy tales and fantasy stories to enjoy this rehash?
The end left a sour taste in my mouth. Not a bad book, but it had the potential to be better.
***Incidentally, Roland is the main character of Stephen King's Dark Tower books, as in R. Browning's "Childe Roland to the Dark Tower Came." But he's a different sort of knight, one with pistols slung around his hips and grit in his teeth.
Monday, March 12, 2007
Head North
Oooh; I'll look into Aussie ones, too.
Friday, March 02, 2007
Thursday, March 01, 2007
Misc.
Discussion for March's book, The Book of Lost Things, will begin the 15th!
Monday, February 26, 2007
The Cool Crowd
Ooo, bask in the Mac Love.
That reminds me of getting together with friends to "study" in college.
At least I have the right computer to become a famous YA author, right?
Friday, February 23, 2007
Virtual Contact
Comment by SarahHooray! I'm adding John Green to the list of author's I've met. I wonder if he knows Tobin Anderson? They seem like they'd get along swimmingly.
2007-02-23 17:37:22
Just cheering the Diana Wynne Jones book on the dresser. I want to be her when I grow up…even though I’m 29. There’s still time.
Love the book tour, Hank. (Any book recs from you two are very welcome and going right to my List.) Will we get the chance to see the rest of John’s book storage system?
Comment by John Green
2007-02-23 20:19:53
Sarah, you should see it shortly…
What do you mean you still aren't watching the Brotherhood 2.0 vlogs? --->They reformatted the main page, so it is THE one to read.
Monday, February 19, 2007
Optional but Interesting
What with new people joining up and in the interest of deciding the state of the self and sharing it, I'm posting Hank's list of questions here. You are welcome to answer none, some or all of them.
I've posted the questions in the comments section; COPY-PASTE the list into your own comment box to answer.
Sunday, February 18, 2007
A. B. C. Rolling Ball & etc.
Regarding American Born Chinese, the discussion is open. I know Susie has a copy because I was with her when she bought it, so I'll post my very short initial blurb here and await further commentary!
One word review: wonderful.
The story was painful, amusing and thought-provoking, but you can NOT talk about this book without referring to the art, which I really liked—clean lines, excellent drafting.
V. nice how the storylines come together.
More when I don't have flying headache.
***Be sure to reserve a copy of March's book at your library: The Book of Lost Things.
Friday, February 16, 2007
The Dark is Rising is a movie!
I refuse to see the Bridge to Terebithia movie and Charlotte's Web. This one might have a chance...
More on casting here.
Thursday, February 01, 2007
Tuesday, January 30, 2007
Let the voting commence....again!
Maybe I should start putting these in the sidebar. I'll upgrade to the New Blogger soon.
Monday, January 29, 2007
Fevvyary
- - - - - - - [Jeopardy music] - - - - - - -
Um, we may have a problem getting these, as many are on backorder at Amazon and I can guess what that means at libraries and bookstores.
I'm looking at the Horn Book's Recently Announced Awards page. Suggestions?
We could choose a book from the less-publicized awards...I think the Newbery Award and Honor books will be v. hard to get.
Potentials:
+ Surrender by Sonya Hartnett (Meera, did you read this one already?) -PRINTZ HONOR
+ American Born Chinese by Gene Luen Yang (I just read this tonight, as it came in on hold at the library, and would love to discuss) -PRINTZ WINNER
+ Copper Sun by Shannon Draper -CORETTA SCOTT KING WINNER
+ The Last Dragon by Silvana de Mari -BATCHELDER (TRANSLATION) HONOR
Do tell!
Thursday, January 25, 2007
Green vs. Green
John's "NannyNannyRichKid" song is awesome.
Hank has a Narnia map on his basement wall.
(Okay, I have one, too, but it's in a box and I had it for when I was teaching.)
Anyway, it's great; they really do look like the brothers from The Proclaimers.
And, wholly unrelated to YA or books period, Making Fiends is also funny and a welcome distraction to a cold cold day.
Wednesday, January 24, 2007
Caldecott, Newbery, Printz, Sibert, etc., Awards announced
Saturday, January 20, 2007
Kalpana's Dream
I did NOT like this book! Was it supposed to be serious? Silly? Both? I spent much of the time asking myself what the hell was going on.
More when I have my notes in front of me--just wanted to get the topic open.
Tuesday, January 16, 2007
2007 Summer Symposium?
I haven't picked my copy of Kalpana's Dream yet; my copy is on hold but we're having ice issues and I don't want to brave the highways. People here don't know how to drive in icy conditions and I'm not risking their inexperience!
Monday, January 08, 2007
Thursday, January 04, 2007
MPH!
Not sure which clip he was in. Hmm.
Dammit; they are in RealPlayer only.
Wednesday, January 03, 2007
A new year, a new book.
Tuesday, January 02, 2007
New Year!
I'm putting up a poll tomorrow sometime. Be sure to vote!
Thursday, December 07, 2006
Sunday, December 03, 2006
Horn Book 2006 Fanfare (click)
Monday, November 27, 2006
To make it official
I'm going to clear out the Wish List books that have been voted down a few times and pepper it with some fresh blood. Add your own suggestions, please! What genres are we missing? (Nonfiction?)
Is getting the book a major obstacle for anyone? I'd love for more people to participate and, if that's the problem, we can easily switch to strictly paperbacks. I'm guessing that time is the issue, though.
If you know someone who might like to join, please invite them.
Sunday, November 19, 2006
Better late...
I haven't read ANY of those books -- not even the picturebooks! I miss hanging out with Simmons people at the bookstore and making intelligent picturebook conversation.
Saturday, November 18, 2006
I found somethin' in the woods, pa...
I liked it, generally, though it's flawed; it reads like the first novel it is. Most of my frustration came from the writing style, with forced-seeming slang and oh-so-awkward dialogue. Plum-Ucci can claim some excuse for this, because, dude, Torey wrote the book; blame the amateur style on him. (As an English teacher, I'd mark Torey down for using "weird" and "weirdness" far too often.) That's not a valid excuse for me. If I'm cringing about the overuse of "DUDE" by page 23, that's probably overkill. Plum-Ucci was just trying too hard to be one of the cool kids. "Turbo-slut" was new to me, though the Urban Dictionary has three definitions; I thought she made it up.
Question: Is a high school student likely to remember a random (albeit dorky) kid using the word "winsome" way back in second grade? I'm not surprised that Chris Creed knew and used that word as a wee, nerdy second grader. What is out of character is self-professed dumb-guy Alex recalling that useage yonks later when he doesn't seem like the kind of person who even know what "winsome" means as a high schooler, much less a seven-year-old. There were multiple times when the personality of a character didn't match up with their actions or words.
I obviously have many bones to pick with Plum-Ucci's style issues. Moving on to structure, (oh boy!) the letters at the end were convenient devices. The last one successfully left me with a feel-good finish, but I don't think they were necessary. Hard to say now if I prefer the story without, but I don't know. Other opinions on Torey's replies?
The American Indian ghost stuff was...weird. No idea where that came from. I was very disappointed that immaculate decomposition is pretend. Or it is as far as I can tell; there are no references online.
I have many critiques about the book, but I did enjoy it. It's a thriller with a not-too-heavyhanded message.
Thursday, November 16, 2006
We're all mad here.
Wednesday, November 15, 2006
It's what's in the bank
What?!
I adore this book (and already own two copies of each book in the trilogy) but this seems...is the word I'm looking for "money-grubbing?"
RH's site explains
Pullman created 16 pages of new materials (archival documents, scientific notes, and found letters of Lord Asriel) just for this edition, whcih [sic] has been illustrated and hand-lettered by renowned Bristish [sic again! Bad Random House!] artist Ian Beck. The deluxe edition also features a ribbon bookmark, colored endpapers, and Pullman's own chapter-opening spot art.
But with the movie coming out next year (and following movies in following years) there will be hideous MOVIE COVERS and all sorts of promotional garbage.
Can I get away with reading a library copy of all these new materials? Doubt it. RH wins and gets my money.
Wednesday, November 08, 2006
Meg Rosoff's top 10 adult books for teenagers
Over at Bookshelves of Doom, the conversation (spurred by Fuse#8) is about ChildLit books one does not like as an adult. I think we could build a HUGE list on that topic.
Wednesday, November 01, 2006
John Green article about "kiddie lit"
Monday, October 23, 2006
Kevin Crossley-Holland Interview and MORE!
Listen or read (click title) the Q & A about his new book, Gatty's Tale.
Did anyone here read his Arthurian trilogy? I only read the first one.
Also, Pullman's His Dark Materials trilogy is filming. Photos here. Nicole Kidman plays Mrs. Coulter; excellent casting, I think! Daniel Craig, the new James Bond, is Lord Asriel. Lyra is played by an unknown; no photos!
Furthermore, it looks like the November book is The Body of Christopher Creed by Carol Plum-Ucci, widely available at your library and in paperback.
Finally, I want to point out that Eunice added her part to the Nick and Norah discussion. Do check it out --
Tuesday, October 17, 2006
"The Unreal Deal"
What did you prefer read as a YA? (Old school) Realistic or (new wave) genre fiction?
I did not realize she published another book: 500 Great Books for Teens.
Perhaps we can each make our own list of (recent) Desert Island Picks soon...I like Silvey's.
'ware bears
One of my concerns about the group reading The Canning Season is that it would be too strange, but, believe it or not, Horvath toned down the irresponsiblitity and craziness of the adults in this book. Was the wackiness too great for anyone? I do love me a bit of quirky.
Did it strike anyone else that this book is not just for young readers? I know people go on and on about books that can be read on multiple levels, but I kept running across parts that I thought kids would not necessarily understand. --- that's not a bad thing; I liked it. The story is also morbid and dark! Ratchet's mother is cruel, Harper's aunt is cruel, the house is surrounded by lethal bears, and then there's the whole story of Tilly?Penpen? (I forget) tripping over her mother's head. Despite this (or because of?), Tilly and Penpen have a healthy view of death.
Horvath does not skimp on the language. She uses big words, curses; the two aunts speak freely in their antiquated manner. I forgot about her use of "fuck" until I read through the Amazon reviews and saw that Horvath lost some fans because of it. In my library, the book is shelved in the YA section, which I agree with. And I LIKE that the aunts have a little sass and say "inappropriate" things (Tilly just can't help herself) -- they are not old pushover spinsters, but fiercely independent women who live as they see fit, regardless of the opinion of others. They may be naive about technology and current affairs, but they are happy and loving people.
(Really, I thought people would be more upset about Harper's repeated use of "Christ" as an explitive than "fuck.")
Any thoughts on the ending? I thought it moved a little too fast, and wrapped up a little too neatly, but I liked it.
Monday, October 16, 2006
Saturday, October 14, 2006
Rev your engines
Discussion is scheduled to begin tomorrow, but I'm not yet finished with The Canning Season. Will do ASAP. How are you coming along?
I'll post a November Book Poll this weekend -- please vote!
Tuesday, September 19, 2006
Genius Grant for Mr. Cathedral
Interview on NPR (audio to be posted later today).
Sunday, September 10, 2006
Et tu?
I finished it last week and it was a positive experience (that's all I'll say for now).
Monday, August 28, 2006
Peter Continued?
I've seen the Dave Barry prequel books, but haven't read them. I'm pretty snobby about follow-ups that are NOT written by the original author.
Sunday, August 27, 2006
Crossover
Do adults feel embarrassed looking at books in the children's section? I always figured they could pretend to look at something for a daughter/son or niece, etc. I never felt bad about it.
Tuesday, August 22, 2006
For next month -
Random House set up an impressive website with excerpts and downloads and links to both authors' websites.
I hope people are still reading Wrecked. Please add your comments to the discussion entry below or begin a new one. And add a couple titles to the Wish List if you have ideas. I'm going to try and find some paperbacks, which should be easier to track down.
Tuesday, August 15, 2006
Wrecked
The only other E.R. Frank book I've read is America -- has anyone else read her other stuff? That was a harsh story. Wrecked struck me (ooh, bad pun) as incredibly sad. I cried a lot.
This blurb leans towards the Reader's Response form of criticism, with lots of personal info thrown in, just an FYI.
Anna's relationship with her parents is fragile. She has little to no meaningful interaction with her mother and her dad has anger/control/fear issues. The brother-sister relationship between Anna and Jack has had its ups and downs, as you do when you get older and just don't pick on each other all the time, instead seeing the other as a person. Frank shows these with lots of flashbacks; I thought they were done well and did not seem forced.
This was a hard book for me to read. I liked it, I liked Anna, I liked Ellen. The hospital scenes with Ellen freaked me out. Her collapsed lung and breathing tubes were too much like my mom's; even the name was the same.
And her father's anger -- his need to control; his insistence that his children recognize that they are wrong and he is right; his obsession that things be done his way, even when it is ridiculous, such as picking up leaves by hand. I know what it is like to be on the receiving end of that. Those parts of the book were disturbing to me and very real, even though my dad isn't quite like that anymore.
The family situation becomes unbearable when Anna has the accident. That's the tipping point, that throws it all out into the open and Anna starts to crumble.
Therapy was not a quick fix. Frank knows what she is doing with that; if you read the flap copy, it explains Frank is a clinical social worker and psychotherapist who focuses on trauma.
I don't know if this book resonated with me because of my mom's recent death and the similarities between my dad and Anna's. The final page did not satisfy me -- yes, we know there is still progress to be made, but it didn't fit. Seemed tacked on. I wanted the dad to leave.
The silence of the stopped scream -- poetic and terrifying.
Friday, August 04, 2006
It is time!
Thursday, July 20, 2006
Nothing New
Nonetheless, I did want to post that Locus had a whole young adult fiction issue in May. I'll have to buy it once I have a Texas address; it looks pretty good.
Also, I love Roger Sutton's comment about The Giving Tree in a recent blog entry.
Tuesday, June 27, 2006
Hooray for Miss Libby!
Take a looky-look! I don't remember who took Publishing in the fall of '03, but Alisa Libby was a demure presence among the rather whiney new recruits. She's been working away on Blood Confessions, and when I last saw her on the T, she had the first color-cover galleys.
Just a lil cheerleading for one of our Simmons alumn! Who's next, ladies?
Monday, June 26, 2006
WHOOPS
I lost all the comments from that last poll when I tried to set up a new poll. Here's what we are gonna do:
Vote by comment. Makes it public, but also keeps the site from eating itself. Hopefully this will not be a problem for long.
Burning City by Ariel and Joaquin Dorfman
A Room on Lorelei Street by Mary E. Pearson
Wrecked by E. R. Frank
Sorry -- I couldn't make it work otherwise. I'll rescue the previous comments and add them.
Monday, June 19, 2006
Grind those gears, Shawn!
Wow. That's my impression of this book. I felt it extremely strongly within the first ten pages, twenty pages, thirty pages—and even at the end, I'm still thinking "wow" (although a little less strongly). This entire premise is fascinating to me. I loved Shawn—his voice, his personality, his honesty, his earnestness—and I loved being in his mind (especially since no one else ever is or could be).
It's so wonderful to think about Shawn being a secret genius, being so with it inside, being so aware and alert, but it's also so sad, to think that no one will know, no one will know him, no one can hear what he wants to say.
The debate of the book—is Shawn's life worth living—is so conflicting and confusing for me to wrap my head around. I love that Shawn likes his life, that he's happy, that he wants to live and doesn't want to die. But I also agree with the dad that Shawn is trapped inside his own body. Because I believe that when you die, it's not the end of you (wait, this isn't going to turn into a religious hedgehogs v. nonreligious hedgehogs argument, is it? KIDDING), part of me really does think that Shawn would be better off dying and being able to be free, fly and soar like he does during his seizures, all the time. He could communicate and have people know him, and he could really be the Shawn that we saw through his narrative. [Obviously we have different versions, if any, of an afterlife, and I'm just imagining mine.] Am I a horrible person for thinking that? Mind you, it's not that I think Shawn's father should kill him. I just can't help but wonder if Shawn would be better off in another world, in another time. He think he's happy now, but I think he could be happier. It's a moot point, since he isn't in another world or another time and he's living life here, but it's still really difficult for me to process, his quality of life and his happiness.
I don't think Shawn's father does or will go through with it. I think he's torn and conflicted, but I don't think he will ever resolve that enough to actually go through with it. It's like Trueman says in the author's note: "I can't say 'yes' to any of these questions. But I can't say 'no' either." And I don't think Shawn's father would go through with it if he can only answer "I don't know." I'm still trying to decide what I think of Shawn's father, though. I know he loves Shawn. But an absent father doesn't gain a whole lot in my mind, even with that.
Before I make any kind of excuses for what I've already written—controversy, controversy, controversy!—I'll stop. Thoughts?
Monday, May 22, 2006
Helloa!
June's book is Stuck in Neutral by Terry Trueman. It has been out for several years in paperback and won a Prinz honor so it should be easy to find or cheap to buy. Except in Alabama, of course.
I hope people's lives slow down a bit so they can read!
Thursday, May 18, 2006
Cause I`m the miggida miggida miggida Mac Daddy
Re: The Newbery Award Winning Book --
Good stuff!
I liked the sketches, photos and other visuals that were sprinkled in the story—not enough to be considered an illustrated novel, but they added another dimension. And you know those kids, always doodling on stuff.
I forgot about the wishing-on-a-star scene at the beginning until near the end. I liked the circular structure and found the ending to be satisfying, albeit unlikely. With all the narrative voices I thought some could have been more developed but the characters were well drawn. Some too perky at times.
Must read Perkins's other non-picturebook book, All Alone in the Universe.
Jump! Jump!
uh huh, uh huh
Monday, May 15, 2006
June Bug
Thank you to those who contribute to the Wish List! Please keep adding more!
Monday, April 17, 2006
Sandpiper, short take on
Oral sex is addressed without vulgarity, open and honestly, though I was a little surprised to have that in my face BOOM! so soon on page two. Piper is aware of her sexual power -- and how it changes her relationship with her dad, his inability to deal. I've never read that in a book before.
Piper's poems were believably from a teenager's pen and relevant. Not syrupy. I liked the nods to other poets.
The only thing that irked me were Derek's corny lines. The note he left: "It's your turn now, Sandy. See you soon!" He talks like a Soc from The Outsiders.
Monday, April 10, 2006
The dawnzer is a lamp. It gives lee light.
FYI: The children's library in Portland's Central Library (one of my favorite buildings) is dedicated to Cleary and there's a sculpture garden in Grant Park with Ramona, Henry Huggins and Ribsy.
What's your favorite Beverly Cleary book?
I've always loved Socks (because it's about a cat and I liked how they cleaned Socks up after his fight and forgot about their dumb baby for a while) (you see, I've NEVER been a baby person) but my favorite Ramona was always Ramona Quimby, Age 8 when she got a whole egg broken on her head. I still have all my old Dell Yearling paperbacks, $2.50 a pop.
Friday, April 07, 2006
May Announcement
The May book is Criss Cross by Lynne Rae Perkins.
BTW, I finished Looking for Alaska last night and added a comment on that post if you want to comment. If you are a commenting sort of person.
Tuesday, April 04, 2006
Looking for a movie?
Did I use "whom" correctly there?
Also, courtesy Bookslut.com, here's an article about sex in YA books. I sell lots of these books at work -- those young Southern Belles gotta get their info somewhere...
Tuesday, March 28, 2006
That time again
Among May's possible books is the 2005 Newbery Medal winner, Criss Cross.
Discussion for Sandpiper begins April 15th.
Thursday, March 16, 2006
Recommendations: YA books that are really long
Tuesday, February 28, 2006
The Final Reckoning
Monday, February 20, 2006
Friday, February 10, 2006
Thursday, February 02, 2006
For the few
Monday, January 30, 2006
That was quick
NOTE: Be sure to get the copy by John Green, not the book of the same title by Peter Jenkins. You want the book about Alaska the person, not Alaska the great wiiiiide wiiiiild whiiiiiiite way.
ADDENDUM: I just realized this book is set in Birmingham, AL; I'll let you all know if Green's representation of setting is accurate -- ie. sweltering and gross.
Saturday, January 28, 2006
I court not the votes of the fickle mob. - Horace
Okay, some explanation is in order.
First of all, Eunice's bribe did not come into my possession by the agreed time. As a result, Criss Cross is not on the list.
Really, though, I thought about it and with all the Newbery hubbubble, figured it would be somewhat difficult to get our hands on copies of the book. Library hold lists are long and even if you wanted to purchase a copy, bookstores are likely to be out of stock (if they carried it at all) and backorders will be in effect. So, I did the drawing as I normally do, no shenanigans, and Criss Cross did not pop up; it will remain on the wish list. Reardless, the books we are voting between look wonderful and I'm having a hard time deciding which to vote for.
Non-Amazon Reviews:
+ An Innocent Soldier at Arthur Levine and The Horn Book.
+ Looking for Alaska at Teenreads.com and at Reading Rants.
+ The Wish List at Bookmunch.
Thursday, January 26, 2006
News from Bloomers
Two important things to share:
1. She expressed, once again, how much she loved having us Simmons grads in her classes, what a good group we were, etc. She sends her love.
2. She's a Grandma!! At last! Wee Jacob came early, and healthy despite the earliness.
Wednesday, January 25, 2006
The Winners
Actually, the Horn Book ALA Awards site has nicer formatting and it explains each medal with a blurb.
Please feel free to add whatever looks interesting to the Wish List. I will set up a poll for March's book later this week.
A new award debuted this year, the Theodor Seuss Geisel Medal. It recognizes the best beginning reader books.
Winner:
Henry and Mudge and the Great Grandpas written by Cynthia Rylant and illustrated by Sucie Stevenson (Simon & Schuster Books for Young Readers)
Monday, January 16, 2006
A Hole That Is Black
• The characters seemed pretty consistent. I felt for Keith and his earnestness.
• I wanted more of a story that followed the beginning, middle, and end rules. Is the ending of Keith’s story (cuddling with Eliza in the motel, exchanging “I love you”s, and then he says “I’m gone”) and Chris’s story (floating in the water, alone on the beach) copouts for Burns? Do the endings mean anything? Do the readers deserve more? Do we deserve to know more about what happens to these two, what decisions they make regarding their future? They are both in limbo, in an unstable state, when we leave them. That might be purposeful (their whole lives are unstable), but I was curious to know more, to know how they survived and how they lived.
• The story jumped around a little too much. I think we could have seen some of the flashback scenes as they were really happening, instead of as they were remembered in a character’s mind. I think I could definitely tell that this was pieced together over a time period instead of written from beginning to end, as most novels. Also, looking back, I’m a little confused about the order of events. In the second “chapter,” Keith finds a female skin in the woods. In the third chapter, Chris appears to be living in the woods already and sheds her skin. But those events seem totally out of order (in the next chapter or two, Chris goes skinny dipping and doesn’t even realize she’s showing symptoms of the bug). Is this just a result of the piecing-together, or did I miss the significance?
• Even though it’s a graphic novel, it still needed to be proofread. There were misspellings (Rob’s last name is spelled two different ways), misplaced commas, missing commas, incorrect possessives (“it’s” instead of “its”), etc., that I found a little distracting.
• The whole book was extremely sexual, with all the vaginal imagery and the actual sex scenes. Even the slit in the frog’s body at the very beginning was extremely sexual. I’m sure the significance of the imagery is that “the bug” was passed through sexual contact, but is there more significance than that? Just that everything comes back to sex, to intimacy, to the human body? There was some phallic imagery, too, if I recall, but certainly not as much as the vaginal stuff (the cut on Chris’s foot that keeps coming back).
• Did Keith know what he was doing when he slept with Eliza? Did he realize that her tail was a symptom of the bug, or did he just think she was “different”? Was he so desperate for love/affection/belonging/getting laid that he willingly “caught” the bug?
• When Eliza was telling Keith how she came to live with those guys in the house and then have her artwork trashed (which she did herself), she was saying how she couldn’t bear to live with her stepdad for another year. So we hear about the different options she tried, including sleeping in the woods with friends. And then one frame shows her come across a guy strung up on a tree, dead (leading to her decision of not living in the woods). What was the significance of that? I had thought all the weirdness of the skeletal figures was that one guy (Rick – and they were probably harmless?) and all the murders were Dave. So did that murdered guy in the tree mean anything? Also, at the beginning of the book, the people around the campfire are talking about how that one girl Lana disappeared and how Roy found that arm. But that was before Dave was obsessed with Chris, so were there really other murders going on in the woods? If there was more than just what Dave did, I felt like I didn’t know enough about it and I was cheated a little bit.
• I found the AIDS metaphor pretty real and current today, with the alienation, the thought that it could never happen to you (the way Keith’s friends are making fun of the yearbook they find), the need to escape but yet not really being able to... Did it simplify the disease at all?
• Was the love between Chris and Rob real? Was the love between Keith and Eliza real? Were they all just desperate to find someone who would accept them, someone who would love them, someone who was also sick, someone who wouldn’t judge them, someone with whom they could escape?
I know that’s a lot to muddle through, but this book is a lot to digest. So I’m just throwing it all out there. Anyone care to pick up a topic and discuss?
Friday, January 06, 2006
Go Bloomers, go!
Here's the booktalk list. She must have listed them in the order she presented them, which must have been nice for her audience. Of course, one can only wonder what her segues could have been, because this list doesn't seem to have a useful order.
Enjoy, dears.
Transformations in Style and Content: Selected Children’s Books of Distinction in 2005
Banyai, Istvan. The Other Side. Chronicle.
Juster, Norton. The Hello, Goodbye Window. Illustrated by Chris Raschka. Hyperion.
Myers, Christopher. Lies and Other Tall Tales. Collected by Zora Neale Hurston. HarperCollins.
Grey, Mini. Traction Man is Here! Knopf.
Meddaugh, Susan. The Witch’s Walking Stick. Houghton.
Philobolus. The Human Alphabet. Photos by John Kane. Roaring Brook.
Woodson, Jacqueline. Show Way. Illustrated by Hudson Talbott. Putnam.
Lester, Julius. The Old African. Illustrated by Jerry Pinkney. Dial.
Lester, Julius. Days of Tears. Hyperion.
Nelson, Marilyn. A Wreath for Emmett Till. Houghton.
Barbour, Karen. Mr. Williams. Holt.
Sidman, Joyce. Song of the Water Boatman and Other Pond Poems. Illustrated by Beckie Prange. Houghton.
Rosen, Michael. Michael Rosen’s Sad Book. Illustrated by Quentin Blake. Candlewick.
Poole, Josephine. Anne Frank. Illustrated by Angela Barrett. Knopf.
Muth, Jon. Zen Shorts. Scholastic.
Say, Allen. The Kamishibai Man. Houghton.
Young, Ed. Beyong the Great Mountais: A Visual Poem about China. Chronicle.
Shulevitz, Uri. The Travels of Benjamin Tudela. Farrar.
Bartoletti, Susan. Hitler Youth. Scholastic.
Erdich, Louise. The Game of Silence. HarperCollins.
Lanagan, Margo. Black Juice. HarperCollins.
Zevin, Gabrielle. Elsewhere. Farrar.
Gerstein, Mordecai. The Old Country. Roaring Brook.
Birdsall, Jeanne. The Penderwicks. Knopf.
McKay, Hilary. Permanent Rose. McElderry.
Yancey, Rick. The Extraordinary Adventures of Alfred Kropp. Bloomsbury.
Perkins, Lynn Rae. CrissCross. Greenwillow.
Lynch, Chris. Inexcusable. Atheneum.
Partridge, Elizabeth. John Lennon: All I Want is the Truth. Viking.
Marsalis, Wynton. Jazz ABZ. Illustrations by Paul Rodgers. Candlewick.
Sabuda, Robert, and Matthew Reinhart. Encyclopedia Prehistorica: Dinosaurs. Candlewick.
Seeger, Laura Vaccaro. Walter Was Worried. Roaring Brook.
Jenkins, Emily. That New Animal. Illustrated by Pierre Pratt. Farrar.
Best, Cari. Are You Going to Be Good? Illustrated by G. Brian Karas. Farrar.
Bee, William. Whatever. Candlewick.
Agee, John. Terrific. Hyperion.
Girmay, Aracelis. changing, changing. George Braziller.
Votes are In
February's book is Full Service by Will Weaver, one of The Horn Book's Best Books of 2005.
Embarrasingly, the only other book on the list I've even looked at is Prehistoric Actual Size by Steve Jenkins, though I plan to read Hilary McKay's third Casson family book Permanent Rose and The Minister's Daughter by Julie Hearn. I may add one of those to the Wish List...
My copy of Black Hole arrived yesterday (along with the ReadyMade book, hooray hooray) and that is one solid chunk of a tome! Not as thick as Blankets but quite substantial. Can't wait to start.
Saturday, December 31, 2005
Aack!
To offset the Amazon bent, here are some other blurbs about the books from Teenreads.com:
+ Full Service
+ Going, Going
+ Zazoo
I'm looking forward to the new year and chatting books up with our two new members! (Can you introduce yourselves?)
Any thoughts on the best book we read this year? I have to say Outcasts of 19 Schuyler Place and So B. It top my list.
Monday, December 19, 2005
Boyz in da hood
I was surprised to like this book. I can't say I enjoyed it because it was painful to read about these boys. But that made it a good read. I was able to connect to Jesse (not so much Rise or Mason) and even his parents a little bit. I realized at the end that CJ and Rise are like Jesse's conscience, pulling him in either direction. And I liked that the whole time I knew which was the right thing to do, and I kept rooting for him and pleading for him not to go where Rise invited him. I like that I was able to connect with the characters, despite my complete removal from their situations.
I have a question: What was the purpose of the girl? (Was it Tania?) Character development? Attraction to the Rise course of action?
Wednesday, December 07, 2005
Should be a comment but it deserves its own post...
Tuesday, December 06, 2005
Meet Lisa
I also invited her because we live in the same house and it would be easy to share the books.
Sunday, December 04, 2005
January --
If you are using a library (and several of the systems Hedgehogs use own copies) get yourself on the hold list soon! Or track down a new/used copy through Bookfinder, Froogle or Amazon. Or, if you are lucky enough to live in a place with half decent bookstores, go buy one at your local independent!
Discussion begins January 15th and hopefully we will have some new voices!
Friday, December 02, 2005
Feelin' Newsy --
You'll need to spend some time there after visiting Citizens for Literary Standards in Schools out of Kansas. Yeah, because I always longed to teach How Green Was My Valley instead of dirty books like Fallen Angels. We don't want them reading ANYTHING interesting. Show me a kid who can make it through Moby Dick and I'll eat my hat. They also list Bartelby [sic] the Scrivener.
It strikes me as odd that Middlemarch is on their Best of the Best List (AKA: A whole lotta old, boring books) (okay, not ALL of them). It's on my to be read shelf -- and has been for YEARS; that is a brick of a book; I can't imagine assigning it -- but I watched a BBC version and I remember a lot of lustful glances artfully displayed.
From Wikipedia.org:
Virginia Woolf described Middlemarch as, "one of the few English novels written for grown up people"So there, Citizens for Literary Standards in Schools! Virginia knows what she's talking about!
Sleep Right!
Tuesday, November 29, 2005
Place your bets -
---> Books #1-8 as taken from the Wishlist.STEP TWO: THE POT
---> Stir thoroughly.STEP THREE: THE WINNERS
I thought it would be a good idea to pull three instead of four to ensure that the winning book does so by more than one vote; it all depends on how many people voice their opinions. We'll see how it goes and change it if we need to, okay?Polling stations are open as of NOW and will remain so until the end of Saturday, December 3rd.
Vote now! Vote once! Click on the title to find out more about the books.
Wednesday, November 23, 2005
Clarification
In other words, how can we choose the January book? (January?! We've been around for a year now!) Pick a random sampling from the list -- maybe, four books? -- and vote on those? Take the two highest voted books and have those for the next two months?
That's what came to my mind. If you have another idea or agree with this one, please insert your assent/dissent here.
Have a delightful Thanksgiving!
Tuesday, November 15, 2005
Le Club de Geographie
I found this book enjoyable. Somewhat. To a point. Kinda.
I found the premise pretty interesting. A gay guy who thinks he's all alone. A group of pretty likeable gay/bisexual high schoolers who want a support group. The dynamics of high school (and you couldn't pay me to go back there).
But the book was just trying too hard for me. I don't mind that Russel is telling us the story—although truthfully I find that a little tired—but there were things that just seemed to be forced. "That's the principal, in case you don't remember." etc etc. He was too cutesy, too geeky but hip-geek, too cheeky with the reader, too I-don't-know-but-it-started-to-bug.
Things happened a little too quickly, without me as the reader seeing enough of the build-up or background. Russel's relationship with Kevin—I had no idea if they had met just that one night at the stinky picnic gazebo or every single night for weeks. I knew that Russel really liked Kevin, but I wasn't sure what was between them and how intimate—emotionally, physically—they had gotten. I wasn't too sure about Kevin in general. What was he really like? He seemed too stereotypical in the two faces he had—sweet when he was alone, a jerk when he was with "the guys." Also, when Russel admits to Brian Bund that he really is gay, I thought Russel was a little too comfortable with that. I didn't get the feeling that he was ready to be out, even if only to one person who was a social outcast.
I was also bothered how the book went to so much trouble to "foreshadow" the bad things that were going to happen. We were hit on the head with it, with the "and I didn't know how bad it would get" kind of idea. It's like we were set up for the fall, and then it happened in small annoying increments (the first time it was the article in the school newspaper, which didn't seem that bad). But the drama in the narrative was too much for me. And if that was because it was Russel saying it, then it's a little too stereotypical (gay drama queen) for me.
I liked that Hartinger picked geography for the club, given what he said about that on his website (the landscape of social groups in high school, all the different "lands"). But I did get a little sick of how everything fit so neatly. All the talk about the "Borderlands of Respectability" and the "Land of the Popular" and so on. I get it. Don't spell it out for me too much.
I picked up volume three of Michael Cart's Rush Hour (called Faces), and Hartinger has a story in there (I think it might be an excerpt, not a short story). I wasn't able to finish it, but it seemed very different from this narrative voice. Wasn't trying as hard. Has anyone read that or anything else by Hartinger?
So I have to say I wasn't overly impressed. Yeah, it's a good idea, and we need more literature out there addressing gay teens, but I just didn't think it was terribly well written. A fine effort, especially for a first novel, but I wasn't bowled over.
Thoughts?
Saturday, November 05, 2005
Igor, go fetch --
The little photos to the left of the column ("inside" the lobes) are hilarious, plus read the bottom of the Where I'm Going lobe.
He's also got a LiveJournal.
Bookslut covers his books (including Geography Club and the sequel The Order of the Poison Oak) here.
*** Just to share my pain, my sad local library "system" has three copies of The Order of the Poison Oak. This sounds good, but someone please explain why they have NO copies of Geography Club and my book had to come from a university library three and a half hours away!
Tuesday, November 01, 2005
Coupla Questions
If yes, then:
1.a. Should we invite more members or are you fine with the people we have?
1.b. Do you want to have a theme for each/some month(s) (award books, sex, books from other countries, drugs, etc.) or keep it random and free-flowing?
1.c. Do you want to pick all the books out for the YEAR at once or vote monthly/bimonthy?
2. Furthermore, if your answer to question one (1) is, "YES, DAMMIT!" then would you be open to a project? No grades, no percentages (and you will get a sticker and/or gold star for participating) and you get a head start.
Sound good?THE PROJECT:
Sometime (or multiple times) during the months of November and December get ye into a bookstore, library or some other printed word source (online, etc.) and BROWSE the Teen/Young Adult/Children's section. Jot down (doesn't that sound fun -- jotting?) 3-5 titles (including authors) that make you go, "Hmmm. That looks mighty fascinating!" (NOTE: Don't say this aloud unless you want the bookstore employees talking about you.)
Don't worry about other people having read it before*** or the Literary Quality of the book; just find something you'd like to read! (Bonus points for books that are in paperback and therefore more easily picked up.)
In early January, if ye be willing to be reading, we'll have a hoo-ha and figure out what to do with the suggestions (dependent on 1.b. and 1.c..)
***Okay, I don't completely mean that. Don't pick something like Charlotte's Web or Charlie and the Chocolate Factory. In fact, avoid Classics. Try to stick to something more recent and, dare I add, Cutting Edge.
Feedback?
Monday, October 31, 2005
Tuesday, October 18, 2005
Sunday, October 16, 2005
So B. It
First of all, I liked Heidi. She's smart without knowing it, and sensitive and logical, but almost friendless. It's an appealing innocence and purity mixed with an unusual self-confidence. Heidi is admirable.
I also enjoyed the writing. Words were chosen carefully. There was foreshadowing and imagery. Everything I read had a purpose; there was no filler. I especially liked how Heidi would hear soof wherever she went.
Probably the least noticeable but most pleasant thing about the book is that none of the characters annoyed me. This happens more than it should. It seems like the popular thing to do lately in both books and TV is to create quirky characters. Most of the time, the quirky is fun and interesting, but sometimes it's taken too far. Too much quirky becomes cliche.
It was simple, entertaining, and meaningful. I really enjoyed it. I think it's the best book we've read so far.
Saturday, October 15, 2005
Next Focus --
+ Autobiography of My Dead BrotherPlease vote for two! Vote now! November is almost here!
+ Geography Club
+ Looking for Alaska
+ Popular Music from Vittula
+ Walter Canis Inflatus : Walter the Farting Dog, Latin-Language Edition
Monday, October 10, 2005
YAWP!
I was going to put up a poll but I think I know what the ratings would be...
The main point of this post was to solicit suggestions for November. How about something that is about a male main character?
Discussion for So B. It begins the 15th! Sarah Weeks, the author, has a website.
Monday, September 19, 2005
A Great and Terrible Beauty
I seem to say this about everything we read but -- generally I liked the book, but there were also some glaring FIRST NOVEL!!! errors in my eyes, enough so that I may not care to read the sequel, Rebel Angels.
Gemma's sense of humor is hilarious. But that is also part of my problem with the story -- Gemma's personality and sense of humor is modern. I'm all for "girls who do things," as Robin McKinley says, but this sounded like a bunch of high school girls from down the street dressed up in Victorian clothing, mouthing 21st century ideals. This isn't a bad thing in itself, and I can usually overlook it in books, but it distracted me, brought me out of the narrative. That is BAD.
Bray did an excellent job capturing the power struggles of the girls within their friendships, and their especial cruelty, as in the escapade with Pippa's new gloves and who gets to wear them. Later on, despite herself, Gemma is glad when Felicity chooses to stay instead of walking to Pippa. We want friends, we want to be chosen.
THE REALM.
First, that's a dumb name. I'm sorry; it's just stupid sounding. Better to call it Virtual Reality World! Motto: Why would you ever leave? The girls get addicted to it. Power corrupts... And the whole transference of power that allows them to bring it out of the REALM is never explained. It is instantaneous, too easily achieved and used recklessly. It was not earned. This is cheating and stinks of juvenile wish-fulfillment and a cop-out on the behalf of the author.
I don't know if it's because A Great and Terrible Beauty is a first novel (though the author has written plays and short stories) (those are different creatures) or just a miss on the editor's judgement, but the obvious leadup to Gemma's noticing the missing photo (pg 326 in my TPB) was HORRIBLE. Don't spell things out! Don't TELL the reader; show them! Gemma goes on and on about noticing smudgy bits on the walls: "Funny how I never noticed that before," "So much I haven't noticed," "But it's a night for seeing things for the first time." Awkward, creaky and OBVIOUS. Get it over with and notice the missing photo already!
There is a lack of orginality in some of the plot twists. Mary Dowd is Gemma's mum?! No way! The cool teacher is dismissed?! Bastards!
My final criticism is on the poor blocking of the scenes with the monster/Circe?/mother? at the end. I don't understand what happened or how they escaped. Overall, it was obviously set up for a sequel (series?). I don't know. Maybe it's just overkill of the "We are girls with magic powers and we kick ass and look cute at the same time! Yay!" and there seems to be so much of that out there right now.
Eunice, didn't you do a paper in YA about secrets? I kept thinking back to that all through this book -- how secrets are powerful.
PS - The girls' meeting in a cave SO reminded me of Dead Poets Society.
Wednesday, September 07, 2005
SE Hinton Interview on the NYTimes
Did you know S.E. stands for Susan Eloise? Such a Soc name.
The Outsiders movie is being re-released, in a new director's cut that is supposed to be truer to the book. (and if you haven't read the book or evor seen the movie, there is a MAJOR spoiler in the above article, so beware!)
Stay gold, guys, stay gold.
